Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +18150%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
384
16
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.504 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
336.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
14.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
295W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Navi 31
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy