Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +2356%
8.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.504 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
336.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
14.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA107S
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy