Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (41W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060 +85%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.504 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
336.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
14.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
188W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy