Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (41W vs 900W)
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050 +205%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.504 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
336.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
14.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
900W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF100
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy