Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 133% (2100MHz vs 902MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
16576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000
5.196 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +3044%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
19456
240
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
750W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
MI300
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
146 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy