Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +2159%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
2880
Shading Units
96
240
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
134W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G80
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy