Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +4379%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
2880
Shading Units
48
240
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GT216
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy