Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620 +579%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G94
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy