Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620 +1736%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT218
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
N10M-GLM
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy