Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000 +44%
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK106
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy