Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620 +164%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro K500M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK107
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy