Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M +149%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM204
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy