Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620 +4009%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
384
Shading Units
8
24
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
23W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G98
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy