Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 6GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1560MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
RTX A3000 Mobile +1380%
12.78 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
32
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
199.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.78 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.78 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
199.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA104
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy