Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1395MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +1390%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
384
Shading Units
4608
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
TU102
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy