Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 62W)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M +79%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GF106
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.17 billion
Unknown
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy