Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1560MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile +825%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1110 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
40
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.97 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
249.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
TU104
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
N19E-Q3-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
13.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
545 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
110W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy