Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M +35%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000M
0.638 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
7
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
336
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GF104
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.95 billion
Unknown
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy