Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 154W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M +275%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
768MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
384
Shading Units
96
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
154W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
G80
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.681 billion
Unknown
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy