Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1124MHz vs 902MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +502%
5.196 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K620M
18
Quadro K6000 +355%
82
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
902 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2880
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GK110B
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy