Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075 +19%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GF110
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy