Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1455MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile +202%
2.607 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
81.48 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.215 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.607 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.48 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
TU117
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy