Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1785MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile +323%
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
TU117
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy