Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M1000M and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (40W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M1000M
1.017 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +410%
5.196 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M1000M
26
Quadro K6000 +215%
82
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
2880
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

15.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
31.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1017 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
31.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK110B
N16P-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy