Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M1000M and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M1000M
1.017 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +1368%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
512
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

15.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
31.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
1017 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
31.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU102
N16P-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy