Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M1200 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1148MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M1200 Mobile
1.469 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +904%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

991 MHz
Base Clock
-
1148 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
8192
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.37 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
45.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1469 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
45.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy