Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M1200 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1148MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M1200 Mobile +6286%
1.469 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

991 MHz
Base Clock
-
1148 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
640
Shading Units
8
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.37 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
45.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1469 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
45.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy