Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M1200 Mobile and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1148MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M1200 Mobile +42%
1.469 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

991 MHz
Base Clock
-
1148 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
448
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

18.37 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
45.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1469 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
45.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy