Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +416%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
128
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G80
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
G80-875-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.0
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy