Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P600 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1620MHz vs 1163MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +43%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro P600 Mobile
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Pascal-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1430 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.92 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.88 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.44 GFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.88 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GP107
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy