NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
+447%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro K1000M
0.326 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2000
+590%
145
Quadro K1000M
21
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GK107
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
