Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +286%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
108W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GT200B
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy