Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +7665%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G84
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy