Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +6058%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
21W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G86
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy