Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +2313%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
32
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G84
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy