Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1480MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +69%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GP106
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy