Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +778%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
640
Shading Units
64
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
70W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G92
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy