Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +273%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK208
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy