Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1480MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +115%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP106
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy