Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1543MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile +293%
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP104
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy