Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +125%
1.405 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
640
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
188W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT200B
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy