NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
+150%
3.524 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000M
34
Tesla K20c
+61%
55
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2496
40
TMUs
208
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK110
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
