Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +204%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
640
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT200B
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy