Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 16GB VRAM Jetson Orin NX 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB +33%
1.88 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.69 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.38 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.760 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.880 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
940.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA10B
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
TE980M-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
Unknown
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

55W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy