Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P10

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P10

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 24GB VRAM Tesla P10 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla P10 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1493MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (694.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Tesla P10 +716%
11.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Sep 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1025 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1808 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
694.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
3840
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
143.3 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
358.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
179.2 GFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.47 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP102
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy