Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1036MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +421%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
-
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
8 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy