Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile +336%
2.122 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
-
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
1024
Shading Units
256
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy