Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.13GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile +359%
2.122 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
-
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy