Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1543MHz vs 1036MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile +160%
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy