Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (1700MHz vs 1036MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +966%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
6656
64
TMUs
416
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy